Quote:
Daour, I'm not trying to flame you at all, but if you were only trying to tell Kuw's side of the story (which I appreciate^^), then you're doing a less than mediocre job on stressing out you are NOT taking sides by writing this in your first contribution to this thread:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The one who pulled the NM was the NIN not KUW and the one who started hitting him was the party leader not KUW , so its not as you said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
" (..) so it's not as you said". This makes you come over to me as someone who is pretty convinced things happened the way he was told it had happened. That's pretty much showing a bias towards Kuw, isn't it?
My first and 2nd post I was not taking sides and I told KUW side of the story , but when people started to flame KUW that bad, I had to take sides here , since the guy is not here to talk for him self, but I didn’t change the story from kuw side of it.
The info I got regarding what happened in that party is from a site where KUW tell his friend what really hapend when some of the members there started to attack him when he posted something about some players wanted to buy KC for real money.
We know in our site (Arabic site) that some people are jealous from KUW for the EX/Rar items and gill that he has.
At that time I didn’t know any thing about what hapend with him regarding pallas till someone started to flame KUW and saying things about it , so I contacted him and asked him about this issue.
At that site KUW explain what hapend there.
And when I asked him , did wanta HP to get items for all the party and the party asked for these items or did she HP because she forgot to get the items for the mission for her self and the DRG after she HP asked for some?
He said she HP back and when we asked why did you HP she said I forgot to get the items for the mission and then the DRG asked her to get some for him.
And as I said first case she has to take a split of the drop , 2nd case she don’t.
Then the real issue here is , why we flame KUW alone since there are 2 people that said split on 5 not 6 ?
And there is a party leader and he’s the one who got the drop and sold it , so do you get me ? ask the party leader not KUW.
Quote:
But apart from that, the story Kuw told you doesn't differ all that much from Wanta's initial post. Both Wanta and Kuw agree on the fact that Wanta warped back for the sake of the mission (I call that "taking one for the team")
Again if she warped back for the party sake , she must have a split on that drop , but if she warped back because she forgot to get the items for her self , then she don’t.
Quote:
and both acknowledge that the leader called a vote, which is indeed the fairest and most diplomatic way to solve things. Since you don't mention anything about the outcome of this vote, I can only assume Kuw acknowledges the outcome as stated by Wanta. That means 3-2 in Wanta's favor. If it wasn't already obvious Wanta should get his cut, I think this outcome emphasizes this even more
This is the missing part of the story , the vote went by /tells not in party chat , and leader didn’t say the out come of the vote in party chat but to wanta (as she say) by /tell , and KUW said to leader (when the voting was taking place , not yet ended) he said I trust you , the drop is with you and you know what’s fair or not. And that was in party chat and wanta didn’t say anything regarding this.
Quote:
Furthermore, you brought up two matters that are of no use in this specific situation. It really doesn't matter whether or not Wanta should have said anything in party chat. He choose not to because he sensed Kuw - someone who claims 1/5 of the loot while I believe it is more common in this situation to get 1/6 - is a person that is impossible to reason with, something I can imagine since I bumped into my share of stubborn debaters in this game as well. Instead of engaging into an endless argument that could jeopardize the real reason why this party was up there, the mission, he asked for a vote.
Not really , and ill explain why:
First KUW didn’t need the mission , he was there helping them , so to him it doesn’t mater if they do the mission or not.
Wanta wants the mission and what I thin she didn’t say anything because she wanted the mission to be done and that’s why she didn’t say anything in party chat.
2nd if I feel that I deserve a split and someone is trying to prevent me from taking what belongs to me , ill do more than just argue in party and ill explain to all that I must take what’s mine.
Quote:
And then there are those stories about Kuw showing his good side. Ya, maybe he did all those things, but that doesn't change anything said on this matter. As we all know, people are subject to change. More than a year ago I confronted this member of the ls I am in with something I didn't like and he peddled up textbook examples of white lies and bogus reasoning just to make it look what happened to me was all my fault. You can find his name in a "favorite Seraph players" thread now. It doesn't make any sense to me because I I have happened to have met the crummy side of his personality, but I am not going to question the stories of other people.
Quote:
Finally, I want to say that I think Wanta has a point when he implies Kuw's limited vocabulary could alter his version of what really went on. I'm going to use an example for this. I was lvlng up Bst in Onzozo when all of a sudden this anon player marched into the first two cocktarices room to speedkill all the birds. He was clearly Japanese. This is what went on in /tell's:
- Me: "Hi! Are you just here to camp Profblix or are you farming?"
- Me: "Well, in any case, could you please spare the three birds in the first room for me? They are my experience^^"
- ***: "No YOUR experience. {Moster} for {Everyone}"
- Me: "Ok. But if you kill then No {Experience points} for me. <me> {Leave} then ; ;"
- ***: "You threat me? I don't like talk to you. I talk GM"
Ya....well, what do you mean Babylonistic confusion? In Wanta's and Kuw's matter this could translate into a second vote that never took place for instance.
Maybe and maybe not , that’s up to them . who knows what really hapend?