Not too bad. No overclocking of any kind and maximum settings.
Can't wait to see my score with a second 970. 8-D
SCORE:15397
AVG: 140 fps
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
Graphics Presets: Custom
General
-Enable HDR rendering and improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Enabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects. (LOD) : Enabled
-Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Enabled
-Real-time Reflections : High
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing) : FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality : High
-Grass Quality : High
Shadows
-Self : Display
-Other NPCs : Display
Shadow Quality
-Use low-detail models on shadows. (LOD) : Disabled
-Shadow Resolution : High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading : Best
-Shadow Softening : Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering : Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering : x16
Movement Physics
-Self : Full
-Other NPCs : Full
Effects
-Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled
-Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : Strong
-Glare : Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Enable depth of field. : Enabled
OS: Windows Technical Preview 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9841.fbl_release.140912-1613)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz (hyper-threading enabled.)
RAM: 16319.719MB (1333Mhz)
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 x1 (VRAM 4095 MB) 9.18.0013.4416
Edited, Oct 20th 2014 10:29am by ffmaniacman
·English·Theme
- Forums
- Final Fantasy XIV
- General Discussion
- Post New Benchmark Results!
Post New Benchmark Results!Follow
Necro Warning: This post occurred more than thirty days after the prior, and may be a necropost.
1 post
Specs:
AMD FX 8350 4,7Ghz
AMD R9 280 Crossfire
16GB RAM
"Score:14260
Average Framerate:140.421
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings."
AMD FX 8350 4,7Ghz
AMD R9 280 Crossfire
16GB RAM
"Score:14260
Average Framerate:140.421
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings."
Necro Warning: This post occurred more than thirty days after the prior, and may be a necropost.
Although this is a necro post, it's probably good to give it a bump.
Heavensward is going to have its own benchmark and demo, which will include a character creator. It'll be neat to see what everyone scores on that!
Heavensward is going to have its own benchmark and demo, which will include a character creator. It'll be neat to see what everyone scores on that!
My crappy 9800GTX+ barely got over 2,000 and yet it runs the full game fine. /confused.
Miss my 560Ti though... it quit on me 2 months ago.
Miss my 560Ti though... it quit on me 2 months ago.
My poor computer is starting to show that I built it to play 1.0 almost 5 years ago. Poor thing.
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
I just recently bought a 2nd 7950 to Crossfire since it was a cheap upgrade. Made a massive difference in the benchmark score, more then double. Shame the same can't be said for in game. Mor Dhona and Limsa stutter down to 20 FPS most of the time, where as the single handles 30-40fps. That being said, every other area in the game hits a consistent 60-120fps.
At least the crossfire has been beneficial for most other games.
At least the crossfire has been beneficial for most other games.
My 560ti plays the game swimmingly, but I play on "very high" and not "maximum" settings.
Hoping to finally upgrade my card soon! Good upgrades are getting a lot cheaper.
Hoping to finally upgrade my card soon! Good upgrades are getting a lot cheaper.
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
Jormungandr
Hyperion
New benchmark is out this morning.
This is with my current setup as such:
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark Tested on: 4/27/2015 9:47:33 AM Score: 7634 Average Frame Rate: 60.041 Performance: Extremely High -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings. Loading Times by Scene Scene #1 1.465 sec Scene #2 5.189 sec Scene #3 4.296 sec Scene #4 4.005 sec Scene #5 4.234 sec Scene #6 1.835 sec Total Loading Time 21.025 sec Screen Size: 1920x1080 Screen Mode: Borderless Windowed DirectX Version: 11 Graphics Presets: Maximum
This is with my current setup as such:
System Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9600.winblue_r9.150322-1500) Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz 16328.238MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 (VRAM 1987 MB) 9.18.0013.5012
Win 7 64bit
AMD FX 6300 @ 3.5Ghz
GTX 560ti @ 1gb VRAM
1980 x 1089
Maximum Settings
Dir X 9 - Score: 5764 87 sec Total Load Time
Dir X 11 - Score 3785 58 sec Total Load Time
All in all not too bad for older hard wear and out of date drivers. I'm not certain the last time I updated some of my hard wear drivers. I set out to maximize the load on my system with the bench so I could see just how hard I could get FFXIV to bog down. Considering that the lowest FPS I hit was 30fps, I think even the console players are going to see a considerable improvement in performance.
AMD FX 6300 @ 3.5Ghz
GTX 560ti @ 1gb VRAM
1980 x 1089
Maximum Settings
Dir X 9 - Score: 5764 87 sec Total Load Time
Dir X 11 - Score 3785 58 sec Total Load Time
All in all not too bad for older hard wear and out of date drivers. I'm not certain the last time I updated some of my hard wear drivers. I set out to maximize the load on my system with the bench so I could see just how hard I could get FFXIV to bog down. Considering that the lowest FPS I hit was 30fps, I think even the console players are going to see a considerable improvement in performance.
Here's mine. Very VERY happy with the results.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark Tested on: 4/27/2015 11:05:16 AM Score: 11181 Average Frame Rate: 85.985 Performance: Extremely High -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings. Loading Times by Scene Scene #1 1.548 sec Scene #2 5.954 sec Scene #3 4.886 sec Scene #4 5.002 sec Scene #5 4.077 sec Scene #6 1.867 sec Total Loading Time 23.336 sec DAT:s20150427110516.dat Screen Size: 1920x1080 Screen Mode: Borderless Windowed DirectX Version: 11 Graphics Presets: Maximum
System Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654) Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4690K CPU @ 3.50GHz 16327.047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (VRAM 3072 MB) 9.18.0013.4752
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
Seems like the GTX 970 made a big difference over the 770. Not enough to upgrade from the 770 to the 970, but enough for it to really be considered the next gen card like nVidia promised.
I've been close to pulling the trigger on a 960, but I'm having second thoughts after seeing all of these 970 benchmark scores.
Thing is, the 960 scores I've seen are in the 7500-ish range, placing them as "extremely high" performance (best rating) on maximum settings. But the 970 scores I've seen are all around the 11,500-ish range... A huge difference for an extra $150.
My big question is if playing at max settings, does it really matter if your benchmark score is 7,500 or 11,500, both of which are "extremely high" performance?
Thing is, the 960 scores I've seen are in the 7500-ish range, placing them as "extremely high" performance (best rating) on maximum settings. But the 970 scores I've seen are all around the 11,500-ish range... A huge difference for an extra $150.
My big question is if playing at max settings, does it really matter if your benchmark score is 7,500 or 11,500, both of which are "extremely high" performance?
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
Jormungandr
Hyperion
Thayos wrote:
I've been close to pulling the trigger on a 960, but I'm having second thoughts after seeing all of these 970 benchmark scores.
Thing is, the 960 scores I've seen are in the 7500-ish range, placing them as "extremely high" performance (best rating) on maximum settings. But the 970 scores I've seen are all around the 11,500-ish range... A huge difference for an extra $150.
My big question is if playing at max settings, does it really matter if your benchmark score is 7,500 or 11,500, both of which are "extremely high" performance?
Thing is, the 960 scores I've seen are in the 7500-ish range, placing them as "extremely high" performance (best rating) on maximum settings. But the 970 scores I've seen are all around the 11,500-ish range... A huge difference for an extra $150.
My big question is if playing at max settings, does it really matter if your benchmark score is 7,500 or 11,500, both of which are "extremely high" performance?
Based on the algorithm they were talking about not completely, as it's taking your CPU more into consideration than your GPU. So while it would have an increase, the fact you're already at 7k that 4-5k difference isn't really much of anything until we see the exact changes DX11 brings to the table for XIV in general. Since Extremely High means you can run without issue, unless your CPU decides to breakdown there's really no reason to drop that extra unless there's other games you plan to max out (that demands way more than ARR.)
My inner "kid in the candy store" wants to jump up to the 970, just because of the bigger numbers... but meanwhile, I think the game looks pretty damn good at windowed 720p with my 560ti, so I'm sure the 960 would give me a big enough performance boost to be worth the $200. I'm really not much of a hardcore gamer outside of FFXIV.
Still, though... the numbers!!!
Still, though... the numbers!!!
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
Jormungandr
Hyperion
DX11
1920 x 1080
Max settings
Score: 9748
Performance: Extremely High
Average framerate: 76.278
I'm running:
Windows 7 64 bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
16GB RAM
1920 x 1080
Max settings
Score: 9748
Performance: Extremely High
Average framerate: 76.278
I'm running:
Windows 7 64 bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
16GB RAM
Star Swirl on Behemoth AKA Best-hemoth AKA The Cool Kid's Table----60AST, 60WHM, 60SCH/SMN, 60BLM, 60MNK, 38 PLD, 34DRG, 31NIN, 27MRD
FFXI- Derpypony on Asura
Check out the Dream Network, a Twitch.tv community for XIV fans, featuring notable streamers like Mr. Happy, MTQcapture, Rahhzay, and Slyakagreyfox! http://dreamnetwork.tv/forum/index.php
Then maybe check out myself, EquestriaGuy, on twitch at http://www.twitch.tv/equestriaguy
FFXI- Derpypony on Asura
Check out the Dream Network, a Twitch.tv community for XIV fans, featuring notable streamers like Mr. Happy, MTQcapture, Rahhzay, and Slyakagreyfox! http://dreamnetwork.tv/forum/index.php
Then maybe check out myself, EquestriaGuy, on twitch at http://www.twitch.tv/equestriaguy
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark Tested on: 4/27/2015 6:37:18 AM Score: 5174 Average Frame Rate: 42.305 Performance: Very High -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions. Loading Times by Scene Scene #1 6.214 sec Scene #2 18.111 sec Scene #3 9.326 sec Scene #4 9.897 sec Scene #5 10.246 sec Scene #6 5.887 sec Total Loading Time 59.683 sec DAT:s20150427063718.dat Screen Size: 1920x1080 Screen Mode: Full Screen DirectX Version: 9 Graphics Presets: Custom General -HDR Rendering: Disabled -Wet Surface Effects: Enabled -Occlusion Culling: Disabled -LOD on Distant Objects: Enabled -LOD Streaming: Disabled -Real-time Reflections: Normal -Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA -Transparent Lighting Quality: Normal -Grass Quality: Normal Shadows -Self: Display -Other NPCs: Hide Shadow Quality -LOD on Shadows: Enabled -Shadow Resolution: Low - 512p -Shadow Cascading: Best -Shadow Softening: Weak Texture Detail -Texture Filtering: Trilinear -Anisotropic Filtering: x4 Movement Physics -Self: Full -Other NPCs: Simple Effects -Limb Darkening: Disabled -Radial Blur: Enabled -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: Off -Glare: Normal Cinematic Cutscenes -Depth of Field: Enabled System Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.110622-1506) AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor 4077.242MB NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ 9.18.0013.4052 FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark Score: 5174 Very High 1920x1080 Custom DirectX9 Full Screen AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV
Heres my first run on max settings:
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/27/2015 6:45:34 PM
Score: 6266
Average Frame Rate: 50.897
Performance: Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 4.900 sec
Scene #2 10.925 sec
Scene #3 6.479 sec
Scene #4 6.827 sec
Scene #5 8.151 sec
Scene #6 4.348 sec
Total Loading Time 41.631 sec
DAT:s20150427184534.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 9
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-HDR Rendering: Enabled
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-LOD Streaming: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: High
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: Strong
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor
16298.957MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti (VRAM 1974 MB) 9.18.0013.4725
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn (Windows version) and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward (Windows version) will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2015 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 6266 1920x1080 Maximum DX9 AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 6266 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX9 Full Screen NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX9 Score: 6266 Very High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX9 Full Screen Score: 6266
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 6266 Very High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX9 Full Screen
AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/27/2015 6:45:34 PM
Score: 6266
Average Frame Rate: 50.897
Performance: Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 4.900 sec
Scene #2 10.925 sec
Scene #3 6.479 sec
Scene #4 6.827 sec
Scene #5 8.151 sec
Scene #6 4.348 sec
Total Loading Time 41.631 sec
DAT:s20150427184534.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 9
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-HDR Rendering: Enabled
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-LOD Streaming: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: High
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: Strong
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor
16298.957MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti (VRAM 1974 MB) 9.18.0013.4725
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn (Windows version) and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward (Windows version) will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2015 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 6266 1920x1080 Maximum DX9 AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 6266 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX9 Full Screen NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX9 Score: 6266 Very High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX9 Full Screen Score: 6266
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 6266 Very High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX9 Full Screen
AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV
"FFXI is DYING!!" -2009
LOL:
Signed: 2023
LOL:
Signed: 2023
went from 3min to 2 hours to DL the benchmark...lolphuckthat.
I can play the game at max settings. All is good.
I can play the game at max settings. All is good.
Went from 335.23 driver up to 347.88 and went up in score from 5400 to this one, something to look into driver wise to see if it makes a difference for you as well.
Little over 7300 for DX9 version.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 6174 Very High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Borderless Windowed
AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/27/2015 7:33:23 PM
Score: 6174
Average Frame Rate: 48.736
Performance: Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 5.478 sec
Scene #2 21.833 sec
Scene #3 10.977 sec
Scene #4 10.715 sec
Scene #5 10.656 sec
Scene #6 5.673 sec
Total Loading Time 65.335 sec
DAT:s20150427193323.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Borderless Windowed
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Highest Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: High Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 8.1 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9600.winblue_r9.150322-1500)
AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
12261.797MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (VRAM 1989 MB) 9.18.0013.4788
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn (Windows version) and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward (Windows version) will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2015 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 6174 1920x1080 Maximum DX11 AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 6174 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Borderless Windowed NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Score: 6174 Very High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Borderless Windowed Score: 6174
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 6174 Very High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Borderless Windowed
AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV
Little over 7300 for DX9 version.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 6174 Very High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Borderless Windowed
AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/27/2015 7:33:23 PM
Score: 6174
Average Frame Rate: 48.736
Performance: Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 5.478 sec
Scene #2 21.833 sec
Scene #3 10.977 sec
Scene #4 10.715 sec
Scene #5 10.656 sec
Scene #6 5.673 sec
Total Loading Time 65.335 sec
DAT:s20150427193323.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Borderless Windowed
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Highest Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: High Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 8.1 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9600.winblue_r9.150322-1500)
AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
12261.797MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (VRAM 1989 MB) 9.18.0013.4788
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn (Windows version) and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward (Windows version) will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2015 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 6174 1920x1080 Maximum DX11 AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 6174 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Borderless Windowed NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Score: 6174 Very High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Borderless Windowed Score: 6174
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 6174 Very High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Borderless Windowed
AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV
FFXIV Gilgamesh: Nghthawk Evenfall
FFXIV Gilgamesh: Nytehawk Evenfall
Time is but a window,
Death is but a doorway,
I'll Be Back
FFXIV Gilgamesh: Nytehawk Evenfall
Time is but a window,
Death is but a doorway,
I'll Be Back
Here is my score. This was High Desktop settings. Any suggested upgrades?
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/27/2015 8:26:35 PM
Score: 3715
Average Frame Rate: 28.797
Performance: High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 4.507 sec
Scene #2 19.002 sec
Scene #3 9.699 sec
Scene #4 9.779 sec
Scene #5 7.989 sec
Scene #6 4.637 sec
Total Loading Time 55.614 sec
DAT:s20150427202635.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: High (Desktop)
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Enabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Highest Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Enabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x8
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Standard Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
AMD FX(tm)-6350 Six-Core Processor
8141.516MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti (VRAM 1990 MB) 9.18.0013.3788
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn (Windows version) and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward (Windows version) will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2015 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 3715 1920x1080 High (Desktop) DX11 AMD FX(tm)-6350 Six-Core Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 3715 1920x1080 High (Desktop) DirectX11 Full Screen NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 High (Desktop) DirectX11 Score: 3715 High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 High (Desktop) DirectX11 Full Screen Score: 3715
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 3715 High
1920x1080 High (Desktop) DirectX11 Full Screen
AMD FX(tm)-6350 Six-Core Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/27/2015 8:26:35 PM
Score: 3715
Average Frame Rate: 28.797
Performance: High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 4.507 sec
Scene #2 19.002 sec
Scene #3 9.699 sec
Scene #4 9.779 sec
Scene #5 7.989 sec
Scene #6 4.637 sec
Total Loading Time 55.614 sec
DAT:s20150427202635.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: High (Desktop)
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Enabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Highest Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Enabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x8
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Standard Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
AMD FX(tm)-6350 Six-Core Processor
8141.516MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti (VRAM 1990 MB) 9.18.0013.3788
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn (Windows version) and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward (Windows version) will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2015 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 3715 1920x1080 High (Desktop) DX11 AMD FX(tm)-6350 Six-Core Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 3715 1920x1080 High (Desktop) DirectX11 Full Screen NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 High (Desktop) DirectX11 Score: 3715 High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 High (Desktop) DirectX11 Full Screen Score: 3715
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 3715 High
1920x1080 High (Desktop) DirectX11 Full Screen
AMD FX(tm)-6350 Six-Core Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV
It seems that AMD cards are posting weaker scores across the board.
I used to really love AMD and believe in them. But Intel and Nvidia really stepped up their game in the last few years.
I used to really love AMD and believe in them. But Intel and Nvidia really stepped up their game in the last few years.
I ran it twice, once on DX9 and once on DX11, both using max setting, full screen.
DX9:
Score: 9585
Average Frame Rate: 80.424
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 3.384 sec
Scene #2 8.196 sec
Scene #3 5.120 sec
Scene #4 4.834 sec
Scene #5 6.964 sec
Scene #6 3.539 sec
Total Loading Time 32.040 sec
DX11:
Score: 6704
Average Frame Rate: 52.356
Performance: Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.490 sec
Scene #2 6.238 sec
Scene #3 5.451 sec
Scene #4 4.670 sec
Scene #5 4.403 sec
Scene #6 2.051 sec
Total Loading Time 25.305 sec
System
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor
16365.242MB
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series (VRAM 2027 MB) 8.17.0010.1333
A pretty solid performance hit using DX11, but still very playable.
Edited, Apr 28th 2015 12:55am by Turin
DX9:
Score: 9585
Average Frame Rate: 80.424
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 3.384 sec
Scene #2 8.196 sec
Scene #3 5.120 sec
Scene #4 4.834 sec
Scene #5 6.964 sec
Scene #6 3.539 sec
Total Loading Time 32.040 sec
DX11:
Score: 6704
Average Frame Rate: 52.356
Performance: Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.490 sec
Scene #2 6.238 sec
Scene #3 5.451 sec
Scene #4 4.670 sec
Scene #5 4.403 sec
Scene #6 2.051 sec
Total Loading Time 25.305 sec
System
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor
16365.242MB
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series (VRAM 2027 MB) 8.17.0010.1333
A pretty solid performance hit using DX11, but still very playable.
Edited, Apr 28th 2015 12:55am by Turin
1 post
I think i should be able to play fine xD
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 28/04/2015 09:58:30
Score: 20492
Average Frame Rate: 173.466
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1.240 sec
Scene #2 5.465 sec
Scene #3 3.595 sec
Scene #4 3.535 sec
Scene #5 3.069 sec
Scene #6 1.266 sec
Total Loading Time 18.171 sec
DAT:s20150428095830.dat
Screen Size: 1280x720
Screen Mode: Windowed
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: High (Laptop)
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Enabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Enabled
-Real-time Reflections: Off
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: Normal
-Grass Quality: Normal
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Enabled
-Shadow Resolution: Normal - 1024p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x4
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Standard Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_rtm.101119-1850)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
16327.992MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (VRAM 4010 MB) 9.18.0013.4788
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 28/04/2015 09:58:30
Score: 20492
Average Frame Rate: 173.466
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1.240 sec
Scene #2 5.465 sec
Scene #3 3.595 sec
Scene #4 3.535 sec
Scene #5 3.069 sec
Scene #6 1.266 sec
Total Loading Time 18.171 sec
DAT:s20150428095830.dat
Screen Size: 1280x720
Screen Mode: Windowed
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: High (Laptop)
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Enabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Enabled
-Real-time Reflections: Off
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: Normal
-Grass Quality: Normal
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Enabled
-Shadow Resolution: Normal - 1024p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x4
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Standard Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_rtm.101119-1850)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
16327.992MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (VRAM 4010 MB) 9.18.0013.4788
Quote:
I think i should be able to play fine xD
You could probably bump yourself up to Max settings instead of High (Laptop) and be ok.
At 20k in high laptop, why not make the game prettier?
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
Catwho wrote:
It seems that AMD cards are posting weaker scores across the board.
I used to really love AMD and believe in them. But Intel and Nvidia really stepped up their game in the last few years.
I used to really love AMD and believe in them. But Intel and Nvidia really stepped up their game in the last few years.
GPUs have always done that. Nvidia pulls ahead, you buy that, AMD pulls ahead, you buy that. Then 5 mins after you buy the one that's leading the pack, the next company releases drivers that helps blow the other out of the water. When I had my Radeon 9800 pro, that was the best bang for my buck. Then god only know what I got, some Nvidia product, I think a 9700 GS (still on AGP). Then it was a GTX 260, GTX 460, HD9750, and now if I'd upgrade it'd probably be back to Nvidia. As for Intel, they've been ahead of the pack for years now.
Good news is now a days, if you invest a decent chunk of cash, they last you longer then they ever did. I've had my 7950 for a couple years now and it'll probably last another 2-3.
Recent Visitors: 214
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (214)
- Forums
- Final Fantasy XIV
- General Discussion
- Post New Benchmark Results!
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC